CommPulse

On Jul 9th I created an order on @MAXKO_Hosting for a VPS in the Croatia location. I followed through with the payment on Jul 11th. Invoice confirmation and server creation emails (Click to expand) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Invoice is paid Date: 2026-07-11 22:43 From: MAXKO [email protected] To: myemail Reply-To: MAXKO Hosting [email protected] We appreciate your business and thank you for choosing MAXKO Hosting. Your invoice is paid and processed. Invoice ID: X Invoice Amount: 196.80 EUR If you have any questions regarding this invoice or any other billing related issue, please feel free to contact the billing department by creating a new ticket from your Client Panel COPYRIGHT (c) 2008 - 2026 MAXKO Hosting [1] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Your VPS is ready! Date: 2026-07-11 22:43 From: MAXKO [email protected] To: myemail Reply-To: MAXKO Hosting [email protected] SERVER READY FOR USE Your order with MAXKO Hosting has been processed successfully. The server is now active and ready for use. SERVER ACCESS DETAILS SERVER NAME: Virtual Private Server IPv4 ADDRESS: X IPv6 ADDRESS: X USERNAME: root PASSWORD: X Please change your initial password after the first login for security reasons. COPYRIGHT (c) 2008 - 2026 MAXKO Hosting [1] Shortly after the VPS was created and I ran yabs and got these results YABS (Click to expand) # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # Yet-Another-Bench-Script # # v2026-07-03 # # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script # # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # Wed Jul 22 05:36:42 AM UTC 2026 Basic System Information: --------------------------------- Uptime : 3 days, 19 hours, 44 minutes Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU cores : 4 @ 2097.572 MHz AES-NI : ❌ Disabled VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled RAM : 7.8 GiB Swap : 8.5 GiB Disk : 48.6 GiB Distro : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Kernel : 6.8.0-136-generic VM Type : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online IPv6 Network Information: --------------------------------- ISP : MAXKO d.o.o. ASN : AS211619 MAXKO d.o.o. Host : MAXKO d.o.o Location : Sisak, Sisak-Moslavina County (03) Country : Croatia fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda2): --------------------------------- Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 88.39 MB/s (21.5k) | 1.09 GB/s (16.6k) Write | 88.62 MB/s (21.6k) | 1.09 GB/s (16.7k) Total | 177.01 MB/s (43.2k) | 2.18 GB/s (33.3k) | | Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 4.30 GB/s (8.2k) | 5.82 GB/s (5.5k) Write | 4.53 GB/s (8.6k) | 6.20 GB/s (5.9k) Total | 8.83 GB/s (16.8k) | 12.03 GB/s (11.4k) iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 246 Mbits/sec | 493 Mbits/sec | 33.8 ms Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 326 Mbits/sec | 604 Mbits/sec | 24.9 ms Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 136 Mbits/sec | busy | 109 ms Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 86.0 Mbits/sec | 327 Mbits/sec | 174 ms Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 46.2 Mbits/sec | 462 Mbits/sec | 181 ms Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 100 Mbits/sec | 419 Mbits/sec | 102 ms Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 85.3 Mbits/sec | 414 Mbits/sec | 206 ms iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 224 Mbits/sec | 471 Mbits/sec | 31.0 ms Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 266 Mbits/sec | 538 Mbits/sec | 22.6 ms Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 136 Mbits/sec | 353 Mbits/sec | 108 ms Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 82.9 Mbits/sec | 359 Mbits/sec | -- Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 123 Mbits/sec | 434 Mbits/sec | 160 ms Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 137 Mbits/sec | 422 Mbits/sec | 103 ms Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 81.5 Mbits/sec | 356 Mbits/sec | 207 ms Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test: --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 337 Multi Core | 877 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18786540 YABS completed in 27 min 26 sec I created a ticket regarding bad performance, over the following day I read up on the cancellation service (discovered that the policy is 3 days after payment, as linked below) and decided to create a ticket requesting refund instead of hoping to get upgraded to a better cpu share. (I know the performance ticket was created on a saturday and they say their support is 24/7 with 48h response time but to this day I haven't received a response to my bad performance ticket, even though because of bad internet at the time I accidentally created 2 identical tickets and saw one was closed due to being a duplicate 1-2 days later while the one that remained open didn't get an answer) Email & ticket I wrote (Click to expand) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Support ticket #3135 created Date: 2026-07-13 15:10 From: MAXKO [email protected] To: myemail Reply-To: MAXKO Hosting [email protected] SUPPORT TICKET CREATED Your support request has been received and ticket #3135 has been created. Subject: Refund request Hello, I want to refund this transaction and terminate the vps order from order number X. The order was created on the 9th but was paid on saturday 11th at 23:00 and that's when service was established The time between Jul. 11, 2026, 23:00:00 AM and Jul. 13, 2026, 3:08:40 PM is: 1 day, 16 hours, 8 minutes, and 40 seconds Reason for cancellation is EXTREMELY poor CPU performance Our support team is available 24/7 and will get back to you as soon as possible. COPYRIGHT (c) 2008 - 2026 MAXKO Hosting [1] Link to Maxko cancellation policy Support reply to my Refund ticket (Click to expand) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New reply on ticket Date: 2026-07-13 19:12 From: MAXKO [email protected] To: myemail Reply-To: MAXKO Hosting [email protected] TICKET UPDATE There is a new reply on support ticket #3135. Hello, Thank you for contacting us. Your order was for a dedicated server, which has a standard deployment time of up to 24 hours. We also offer a Priority/Fast Installation option during checkout for customers who require faster deployment, but this option was not selected for your order. Additionally, your order was placed on 9 July, which was immediately before the weekend. Despite this, our team completed the installation during the weekend, and your server was delivered on 11 July. Regarding your refund request, we are unable to approve it. The deployment time was within the service conditions, and the server specifications were exactly as selected during the ordering process. If you are experiencing CPU performance issues, please let us know the workload or application you are running. We would be happy to recommend a more suitable dedicated server or another location that better fits your requirements. Depending on the hardware, there may be a small price difference. We are committed to helping you find the best solution for your needs. Best Regards, Mahmoud Hamdy You can view or respond to this message directly from your panel at MAXKO Hosting [1]. COPYRIGHT (c) 2008 - 2026 MAXKO Hosting [2] After seeing this lie-ridden email I responded to the ticket and wrote an email explaining that the order wasn't for a dedi but for a VPS, which is covered by Cancellation policy and I explained again the order was created on the 9th but wasn't paid for until 11th and that the service wasn't established before payment was completed. I received no reply and they disabled my user account on their website shortly after, while the VPS remained online (I had no way of accessing the VPS controls dashboard from this point on) After this happened I received a response in LET DMS (on July 17th) from Maxko hosting to my message (that was sent on July 2nd) where I inquired about the VPS that I ended up ordering on 9th (without getting a reply on LET) Maxko Hosting LET DM July 17th - translated from Croatian (Click to expand) Hello, Apologies for the delayed response; we are no longer active on the forum. Would you be purchasing as an individual or a company? We need to know so we can prepare a quote. My response to their DM July 22nd - Translated from Croatian (Click to expand) Hello, I purchased a private VPS hosted in Croatia, but I am dissatisfied with the performance (to say I am dissatisfied is an understatement, considering the price). I requested a refund within three days of payment and service activation, but your representative, Mahmoud Hamdy, fabricated lies to reject the refund request. Specifically, the order was placed on July 9th, but payment was not made until the evening of July 11th; the service was activated after that, at which point I ran a YABS benchmark and submitted a complaint regarding performance complaint to which you have still not responded. I submitted the refund request on July 13th—one day and approximately 16 hours after payment. Mahmoud Hamdy claimed that I had placed an order for a dedicated server on July 9th and that your team spent until July 11th setting it up, which is absolutely untrue. First, the order was for a VPS, not a dedicated server. Second, why would you set up a dedicated server two days before payment was even made? Our account on the website has been closed and the money has not been refunded, yet the VPS remains online... I ask for some professionalism so that I do not have to post about this on forums. Order number: X. Maxko Hosting 2nd LET DM July 22nd - translated from Croatian (Click to expand) Greeting, A few days ago we added additional nodes to the Croatian location. I suggest that we migrate the VPS to a new node and if the performance is satisfactory, we extend the service for free for a month, otherwise we return the paid amount. If you agree with the offer, please provide the VPS IP. LP (short for Kind Greetings), MAXKO Team My response to their 2nd DM July 23rd - translated from Croatian (Click to expand) Hello, Thank you for the offer, but in the meantime, I have already purchased another VPS and completed the migration, so the migration to a new node is unnescessary. Please issue a refund for the amount paid and let me know when it will be processed. The order number is X, as previously mentioned. Best regards. To this day I haven't received a reply to my DM, email or ticket, nor have I received a refund and the VPS is still online.

The Trump administration has found itself at the centre of another embarrassing controversy after a U.S. State Department presentation at the AIDS 2026 conference displayed an AI-generated map that mislabelled every country in Africa. The slide, shown during a global health presentation in Brazil, sparked widespread mockery online after attendees shared screenshots. In this Firstpost Live episode, we analyse the State Department's responsibility, saying the slide was hastily edited before the event. The incident has also raised fresh questions about government reliance on artificial intelligence, quality control, and whether the world's most powerful country is becoming too casual with facts. Josh Barnes tells you more. Moderator please change this to Offtopic Thanks!

I want a large hdd server approx 40tb with 10gbps 330tb Bandwidth must be dmca ignored budget under 150 euro

Has anyone tried their services? I'm interested in Iceland and Russia location.

Hey All, Just wanted to post a heads-up and document a recent practice by iON Cloud by Krypt regarding active, pre-paid annual plans. If you are running any legacy VPS with them, back up your data immediately and check your inbox. Service & Contract Background Plan: 1 vCPU / 2GB RAM / 40GB SSD / 1TB Bandwidth (ION-L09) Active Pre-paid Term: Dec 10, 2025 – Dec 09, 2026 (Fully paid up-front) Timeline of Events July 31, 2026 (1-Day Notice): Received an automated email stating that effective August 1, 2026, my legacy VPS will be forcibly migrated to their current "iON Pro 1" base plan. New Plan: 4 vCPU / 8GB RAM / 160GB SSD / 5TB Bandwidth New Rate: $40.00 / month (an 800% price increase for unneeded resources). My Response: I opened a billing ticket objecting to the mid-contract change, pointing out my active pre-paid contract valid through Dec 09, 2026, and requesting them to either honor the remaining term or provide a lower-tier plan. Billing's Response: Billing explicitly refused, stating: "As previously communicated, effective August 1, 2026, all affected legacy VPS services will be migrated to our current service plans... We are unable to maintain the legacy plan or pricing, and no alternative lower-tier plans are available." The "Store Credit" Trap: Since they refused to fulfill the contract, I agreed to cancellation and requested a pro-rated refund back to my original payment method for the remaining ~4.3 months. They replied: "As previously advised, we are unable to provide a refund to the original payment method. Any remaining prepaid balance will be applied to your account as account credit in accordance with our policy." Key Takeaways for the Community Zero Contract Integrity: Annual pre-paid agreements mean nothing to iON Cloud / Krypt. They will terminate active paid plans mid-term with less than 24–48 hours of advance notice. Forced Migrations: They push unnecessary 8x upgrades ($40/mo) on legacy users rather than offering reasonable lower tiers. Useless Refunds: Unilaterally terminating a contract on their end while refusing cash refunds—forcing non-refundable store credit on a provider you are leaving—is completely unacceptable. Consider this a public warning for anyone relying on iON Cloud / Krypt for long-term or pre-paid hosting.

I hope everyone can help me out. I need this server, it costs 50 bucks. If you have any, please contact me. Thanks everyone

I bought a machine (server) from Nuyek on July 22nd. It's now been 7 days and the order status is still "Pending." I've submitted a support ticket, but they haven't responded either. What should I do?

Normally I don't care much about limited promos but I didn't know vpshostingservice / @tpoll yet except for some basic info, which had created some interest, so I had a look at the offer. What "got" me and made me buy one (the cheapest) mainly was the really low price, 2 vCores of a supposedly fast processor, the recurring offer, and, albeit cautiously the unlimited traffic. Here's the results of > 30 benchmark runs over >= 24 hrs. Hint: buckle up! First, sysinfo, processor & memory Version 2.5.0a, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com) Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900K OS, version: FreeBSD 14.4, Mem.: 1.989 GB CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/183/1 Cache: 32K/64K L1d/L1i, 4096K L2, 36M L3 Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb umip pku ospke syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm lzcnt AES? Yes Nested Virt.? Yes HW RNG? Yes ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 505.0 - min 186.9 (37.0 %), max 820.2 (162.4 %) ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 1366.8 - min 1210.0 (88.5 %), max 1520.0 (111.2 %) ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 1429.1 - min 1260.0 (88.2 %), max 1550.0 (108.5 %) ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 2651.8 - min 2577.3 (97.2 %), max 2717.4 (102.5 %) ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 198.8 - min 186.9 (94.0 %), max 207.8 (104.5 %) WUT? 500+ MB/s single-core avg? And well matched and high multi-core results. Plus over 2500 MB/s AES and pretty much double the RSA keypairs per second I usually see on fast processors! This VPS clearly has the fastest processor I benchmarked so far! And for about $20/year! Frankly with that kind of processing power that box could have a boring old-style SSD and mediocre connectivity and I'd still be happy and call it a good deal. But no, wait and see ... --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 7.53 - min 6.23 (82.7%), max 8.57 (113.8%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 7.04 - min 6.33 (89.9%), max 8.05 (114.3%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 16.02 - min 13.08 (81.7%), max 19.84 (123.9%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 14.91 - min 12.59 (84.4%), max 18.70 (125.4%) --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 7.13 - min 6.32 (88.6%), max 8.12 (113.9%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 6.83 - min 5.88 (86.1%), max 7.70 (112.7%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 15.54 - min 13.30 (85.6%), max 19.69 (126.7%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 14.65 - min 12.74 (87.0%), max 18.05 (123.2%) --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 78.53 - min 71.98 (91.7%), max 111.55 (142.0%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 72.54 - min 67.60 (93.2%), max 78.24 (107.9%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2762.90 - min 2507.97 (90.8%), max 2973.97 (107.6%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 205.07 - min 175.73 (85.7%), max 224.75 (109.6%) --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 20.34 - min 17.73 (87.2%), max 22.52 (110.7%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 13.20 - min 10.25 (77.6%), max 15.30 (115.9%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2757.39 - min 2514.95 (91.2%), max 2951.18 (107.0%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 201.74 - min 168.27 (83.4%), max 226.61 (112.3%) --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 351.89 - min 313.92 (89.2%), max 367.91 (104.6%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 417.48 - min 382.93 (91.7%), max 447.95 (107.3%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 3013.75 - min 2914.00 (96.7%), max 3186.12 (105.7%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 887.17 - min 833.02 (93.9%), max 923.27 (104.1%) --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 113.20 - min 73.32 (64.8%), max 120.88 (106.8%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 103.21 - min 92.82 (89.9%), max 115.96 (112.4%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 3127.43 - min 2981.84 (95.3%), max 3324.28 (106.3%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 896.91 - min 827.43 (92.3%), max 956.37 (106.6%) --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 47.18 - min 46.52 (98.6%), max 47.60 (100.9%) IOps : avg 12077.15 - min 11908.60 (98.6%), max 12186.73 (100.9%) Almost 50 MB/s and 12000 IOps in 4k/4t mode is a very good result by itself, but look at the super-tight spread! which translates to "this NVMe performs consistently good "! But to be honest I was prepared to get, uhm, ... only mediocre connectivity because AFAIK vpshostingservice runs on ColoCrossing infrastructure which I (falsely I guess) assumed to be HE and/or Cogent (which I've learned to strongly dislike) linked - but with that processor and disk performance I didn't even care and was fully prepared to like my new little server anyway ... So, let's see ... --- Europe --- NO OSL mirror.terrahost.no [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 110.9 - min 98.8 (89.1%), max 115.4 (104.0%) Ping [ms]: avg 97.7 - min 97.5 (99.8%), max 97.8 (100.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 137.7 - min 97.5 (70.8%), max 200.9 (145.9%) UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 131.5 - min 115.9 (88.1%), max 140.9 (107.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 87.0 - min 86.3 (99.2%), max 87.9 (101.0%) Web ping [ms]: avg 89.0 - min 86.3 (97.0%), max 105.7 (118.8%) NL AMS nl.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 125.3 - min 109.9 (87.7%), max 129.3 (103.2%) Ping [ms]: avg 87.4 - min 86.8 (99.3%), max 88.6 (101.3%) Web ping [ms]: avg 89.5 - min 86.8 (96.9%), max 97.1 (108.4%) DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 124.8 - min 123.9 (99.3%), max 125.8 (100.8%) Ping [ms]: avg 90.7 - min 90.3 (99.6%), max 93.4 (103.0%) Web ping [ms]: avg 90.8 - min 90.4 (99.6%), max 93.4 (102.9%) FR PAR mirror.in2p3.fr [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 113.4 - min 107.8 (95.1%), max 120.0 (105.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 94.6 - min 94.4 (99.8%), max 95.2 (100.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 129.6 - min 103.7 (80.0%), max 414.4 (319.7%) CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 122.5 - min 116.4 (95.0%), max 130.4 (106.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 96.0 - min 95.7 (99.7%), max 96.1 (100.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 103.6 - min 95.9 (92.6%), max 120.3 (116.2%) ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 121.8 - min 118.6 (97.4%), max 123.5 (101.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 92.4 - min 92.1 (99.6%), max 96.0 (103.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 94.1 - min 92.3 (98.1%), max 96.2 (102.3%) RO BUC mirrors.hosterion.ro [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 90.7 - min 84.5 (93.2%), max 98.0 (108.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 119.0 - min 116.1 (97.6%), max 122.0 (102.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 124.0 - min 116.3 (93.8%), max 133.6 (107.8%) RU MOS mirror.yandex.ru [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 75.2 - min 70.2 (93.4%), max 80.2 (106.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 144.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 150.0 (104.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 155.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 337.3 (216.4%) RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 20] DL [Mb/s]: avg 50.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 97.5 (192.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 117.1 - min 116.7 (99.7%), max 119.3 (101.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 124.0 - min 116.8 (94.2%), max 150.7 (121.5%) --- Asia/Oceania --- RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 63.5 - min 22.2 (34.9%), max 71.0 (111.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 167.6 - min 165.1 (98.5%), max 172.7 (103.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 182.2 - min 165.1 (90.6%), max 231.2 (126.9%) IN MUM mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 46.3 - min 41.3 (89.1%), max 49.4 (106.7%) Ping [ms]: avg 244.5 - min 163.6 (66.9%), max 246.7 (100.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 250.4 - min 246.0 (98.2%), max 272.6 (108.8%) SG SGP mirror.sg.gs [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 47.4 - min 40.9 (86.3%), max 51.5 (108.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 225.3 - min 217.9 (96.7%), max 235.8 (104.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 238.9 - min 223.7 (93.6%), max 260.4 (109.0%) CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 59.0 - min 56.8 (96.3%), max 59.9 (101.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 191.0 - min 190.7 (99.8%), max 191.3 (100.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 195.4 - min 190.9 (97.7%), max 304.2 (155.7%) CN BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 43.1 - min 35.6 (82.8%), max 51.7 (120.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 240.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 283.1 (117.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 252.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 300.4 (119.2%) JP TOK ftp.udx.icscoe.jp [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 65.1 - min 33.7 (51.7%), max 75.8 (116.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 153.6 - min 153.4 (99.8%), max 154.4 (100.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 164.1 - min 153.5 (93.5%), max 176.9 (107.8%) AU SYD mirrors.xtom.au [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 60.3 - min 58.4 (96.8%), max 61.6 (102.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 191.2 - min 190.9 (99.9%), max 191.3 (100.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 251.5 - min 226.5 (90.1%), max 330.8 (131.5%) --- Africa --- ZA WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 45.7 - min 25.9 (56.7%), max 50.4 (110.2%) Ping [ms]: avg 227.4 - min 223.7 (98.4%), max 245.8 (108.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 242.9 - min 224.2 (92.3%), max 274.4 (113.0%) --- Americas --- CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 432.5 - min 425.4 (98.4%), max 434.7 (100.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 11.9 - min 11.7 (98.0%), max 12.7 (106.4%) Web ping [ms]: avg 12.0 - min 11.7 (97.2%), max 12.7 (105.5%) US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 430.1 - min 419.0 (97.4%), max 433.9 (100.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 12.0 - min 11.7 (97.7%), max 12.2 (101.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 12.1 - min 11.8 (97.2%), max 12.6 (103.8%) US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 421.4 - min 408.1 (96.8%), max 423.2 (100.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 17.5 - min 17.2 (98.0%), max 19.8 (112.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 18.0 - min 17.2 (95.3%), max 24.6 (136.3%) US WDC speedtest.wdc2.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 310.7 - min 84.7 (27.3%), max 423.0 (136.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 17.7 - min 17.4 (98.4%), max 17.9 (101.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 17.9 - min 17.5 (98.0%), max 18.8 (105.3%) US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 374.9 - min 223.5 (59.6%), max 409.7 (109.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 23.2 - min 23.0 (99.3%), max 23.4 (101.0%) Web ping [ms]: avg 25.6 - min 23.1 (90.3%), max 28.5 (111.3%) US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 243.8 - min 162.7 (66.7%), max 265.4 (108.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 45.9 - min 45.7 (99.6%), max 46.1 (100.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 45.9 - min 45.7 (99.5%), max 46.5 (101.2%) US CHI speedtest.chi11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 430.7 - min 427.7 (99.3%), max 432.6 (100.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 12.5 - min 12.3 (98.3%), max 12.6 (100.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 12.6 - min 12.3 (97.9%), max 12.8 (101.9%) US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 369.8 - min 332.4 (89.9%), max 400.7 (108.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 30.2 - min 26.7 (88.4%), max 33.1 (109.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 32.7 - min 26.7 (81.7%), max 47.6 (145.6%) US PHO speedtest.phx1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 202.6 - min 175.0 (86.4%), max 215.0 (106.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 58.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 70.8 (121.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 58.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 70.8 (121.7%) US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 169.7 - min 167.2 (98.6%), max 171.1 (100.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 66.5 - min 66.0 (99.3%), max 70.8 (106.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 70.8 - min 67.2 (95.0%), max 81.4 (115.0%) US LAX mirror.alma.lax1.serverforge.org [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 169.9 - min 111.2 (65.4%), max 199.8 (117.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 67.4 - min 56.5 (83.8%), max 78.2 (116.0%) Web ping [ms]: avg 72.7 - min 57.0 (78.4%), max 91.6 (126.0%) US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 139.0 - min 103.7 (74.6%), max 149.3 (107.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 78.6 - min 75.4 (96.0%), max 93.0 (118.4%) Web ping [ms]: avg 81.4 - min 75.6 (92.9%), max 104.7 (128.7%) US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 198.9 - min 168.0 (84.5%), max 210.5 (105.8%) Ping [ms]: avg 57.5 - min 57.4 (99.9%), max 57.6 (100.3%) Web ping [ms]: avg 57.6 - min 57.4 (99.7%), max 58.8 (102.1%) BR SPA mirrors.ic.unicamp.br [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 65.4 - min 56.2 (86.0%), max 74.4 (113.8%) Ping [ms]: avg 177.8 - min 152.8 (85.9%), max 201.1 (113.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 177.8 - min 152.8 (85.9%), max 201.1 (113.1%) BR CUR archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 63.5 - min 55.3 (87.2%), max 72.2 (113.7%) Ping [ms]: avg 181.9 - min 159.7 (87.8%), max 204.1 (112.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 181.9 - min 159.7 (87.8%), max 204.1 (112.2%) CL SAN mirror.anquan.cl [F: 4] DL [Mb/s]: avg 40.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 83.5 (204.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 144.3 - min 136.2 (94.4%), max 155.1 (107.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 178.1 - min 141.7 (79.5%), max 255.0 (143.1%) CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 2] DL [Mb/s]: avg 63.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 82.3 (129.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 142.6 - min 138.5 (97.1%), max 159.1 (111.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 150.9 - min 138.6 (91.8%), max 171.3 (113.5%) Europe - OK, UK, Lon, NL, Ams, and DE, Fra showing good results isn't a surprise, but NO, Osl, and FR, Par, and even CH and ES showing results well above 100 Mb/s is a very nice start indeed! Asia / Oceania - well, I'd call those results decent for a VPS in Buffalo, I guess. Nothing to write home about but neither a reason to complain. Maybe from an american perspective the verdict would be more positive. Africa - let's politely skip that Americas - 400+ Mb/s in Murrica, East-Coast? OK, I'm very Europe-centric and relatively ignorant/clueless wrt Murrica but 400+ Mb/s? I don't think I ever saw results like that. OK, about 250 Mb/s is another level but actually not bad for Miami. Chicago reaches 400+ Mb/s again and then the numbers get lower towards the West, ending with very respectable (almost) 200 Mb/s in the North and still really good 170-ish Mb/s in the South. Finally the two Brazil targets as well as at least one Chile target show quite respectable results too. Really nice. The secret sauce? Almost no HE or Cogent (except within Murrica) and plenty twelve99 and other top carriers! Very well done! @tpoll , what are you doing with us? Didn't they inform you that 20 bucks per year buys maybe nice but not really good VPS on LET (if one is lucky)? And then comes tpoll and gives us a really, really nice, highly performant, and well rounded VPS for less than two bucks per month? Didn't it cross your mind that a reviewer is used to have something to complain about, at least some detail? How reckless and ignorant of you to throw such a performant and balanced VPS without even a single issue to complain about at us and dirt-cheap at that?! Here is my revenge: highly recommended! One of the best deals I ever tested.

I'm posting this because there are probably quite a few ProHosting customers here. VPS Price Update Dear customer, due to the ongoing chip shortage and increased hardware replacement costs, VPS plans purchased through special deals/promotions will increase by €2.00 per billing period starting 01.07.2026. What can i do? You can renew your server before 01.07.2026 to keep your current pricing for the prepaid period. As always, all services are prepaid and can simply be left to expire if the new pricing no longer fits your needs. Thank you for your ongoing support ProHosting24 This is quite a price increase, especially considering that this host advertised monthly payments. The pricing is now in the range of Netcup and similar providers.

The vps is down since 2 days , no reply on tickets , and no status for me to check what's happening, the virtualizor panel won't load, Turns out they did mail me but it was on spam, and 4 days of outages, really? These guys are really bad at costumer support (even on normal days)

Hello. In search of a DMCA-ignored dedicated server for CDN of a file sharing website. RAM: 16 GB to 32 GB Storage: SSD 1 TB (512 GB RAID-0 ok; server will only hold a cache). Bandwitdth: 1 Gbps unmetered (334 TB) Budget: < $100/month Any offers?

I am looking for dedicated server in North America something in budget atleast 128gb ram

We are HostCram LLC , a US-based Wyoming registered company ( Filing ID: 2016-000736577 ) Back with our new Ryzen 7700 & 7900 KVM Deals on LowEndTalk. Our company registration can be verified here . We also provide Private Proxy , Email Servers , IP Rental & ASN services. We are present on dozens of ISPs, businesses, and hosting networks, with servers offering BGP sessions and IP announcements. One month free service for clients paying by cryptocurrency!! Post benchmarks on any forum and never be charged for bandwidth overuse. Existing clients can get Free Offsite Backup and restore slots enabled by posting a short review on any forum. Also, thanks for your continuous support, recommendations, and trust in me. New Features Included with Every Plan: Full Windows Server 2019 & 2022 automation Free Offsite Backup and Restore slots Redesigned & more secure Cloud Portal DHCP support for seamless network configuration Free IPv6 assignment directly from Cloud Portal Our Custom Built Ryzen 7000 Nodes Specification: Supermicro & In-Win Chassis with 80+ Gold PSU ASRock Rack, Gigabyte & Supermicro B650E Mobo AMD Ryzen 7700/7900 Processor with Boosted Speed Dynatron & Supermicro CPU Cooler for maximum cooling 192GB Crucial/Corsair/G.Skill DDR5 RAM Kits 2x2TB Samsung 990 Pro/Nextorage 4.0 NVMe (in ZFS RAID1) Debt-free, fully owned hardware inside FiberState SLC1 – Salt Lake City, Utah, USA data center. Looking Glass > https://lg-slc.hostcram.com Future processor upgrades at no additional cost! RYZEN: Killer-1C 1x RYZEN 7700 Core @ 5.30 GHz 3 GB DDR5 RAM 30 GB NVMe Storage 10 TB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps Port 1 Dedicated IPv4 (Free IPv6) Order now: $30/Year or $50 for 2 Years (Recurring) Very limited stock. More plans can be found here: https://www.hostcram.com/vps Accepted primary payment methods: ACH, Debit/Credit Cards, PayPal, Payoneer, Bank Transfer, Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, USDT & 100+ Other Cryptocurrency One month of free service for clients paying with cryptocurrency. Refund Policy: Plans or services listed under this thread don't qualify for a refund. If you're unsure about something, ask us before buying. Don't buy if you want to do CPU mining. Don't buy if you want to use 100% of your resources 24/7. Those are not email servers. Contact us for buying email servers. Signup link > https://my.hostcram.com/order/main/index/register Limited stock available. Benchmarks are for reference only. We don't guarantee the same level of performance. We will assign you to a different node once the current one is sold out. Each order will be reviewed later. We accept orders placed using a proxy or VPN, as long as your account has valid contact information. All questions are answerable via support ticket and live chat . Don't forget to read our TOS , AUP & Privacy Policy before signing up. Thanks.

OVH launched a new VPS line 2027 with changes in hardware and pricing. This line goes back to old standards, but without the smallest plan existed before 2026. The prices going up almost 100% The launched hardware is unknown, waiting for yabs, if someone is willing to test. Sadly no local zones and less locations than before.

I just got the email from Reliablesite that they are taking preorders for their Mexico DC. Interesting location, never thought I would see Mexico given they already have Miami/Los Angeles. Link to Mexico servers: https://www.reliablesite.net/dedicated-servers/mexico-dedicated-servers.aspx Email: Our Mexico location is in its final phase. Racks are in, the network is being tested, and we're close to the official launch. As we prepare, pre-orders for our AMD EPYC and Ryzen dedicated servers in Mexico are now open. Secure your preferred configuration today and be among the first to deploy when our new location launches. Choose from our high-performance bare metal, available for pre-order: AMD EPYC 4545P 256GB AMD Ryzen 9950X 256GB Our Querétaro, Mexico location will mirror the bare metal infrastructure of our U.S. and Europe regions, with instant provisioning, 24/7 in-house technical support, and DDoS protection enabled by default. All servers in Mexico include 500 Mbps of unmetered bandwidth. Claim Your Server Today If you have any questions, simply reply to this email or open a ticket, and our team will get back to you shortly. Mexico is one of several new locations we’re introducing this summer at ReliableSite. We’ll have more to share soon. — The ReliableSite Team

As you may know from previous discussions, I moved my hosting to Asia with Asian companies, and I am always looking for Asian providers offering services in Asia. I was searching for a low-cost dedicated machine from an Asian provider in Asia. To my surprise, I found a legitimate-looking offer from NCXhost.com in India. It is a Tier III data centre in the north-east of India offering direct services. I needed the machine for more than basic computing, such as hosting for AI and ML. Dedicated Machine with GPU listed as GPU GN1 Nano : 8 GB VRAM (GPU) - nvidia 3050 4 Cores - 4 Threads - Core i5-6500 16 GB RAM 1TB NVMe SSD IPv4 & IPv6 Dedicated IP address Unlimited Bandwidth 7999 INR/month or ~84 USD/month I inquired about the provisioning time, and was told that it is 72 hours. Private email hosting is also permitted, as I requested. Some premium options, such as the G2 with an RTX 4090, are available for next-day delivery. [Way out of my budget, though.] There is also a 20% recurring discount: AIRESEARCH Note: I have no affiliation with the provider other than being from the same country and continent, nor do I receive any monetary benefit for sharing this information. I just found out about this Budget Dedicated Machine with GPU option. This is something new for me, especially from an Indian provider. According to my communications with support: This is their way of giving back to the student and research community. Could this system be a good option for beginners in AI/ML research and academia? For this flat price, I get a decent Nvidia dGPU compute system that I can run 24/7. It is neither sliced nor shared with anyone else and there are no other limits whatsoever. The bandwidth is unlimited too. I suppose these are the perks of the services offered by a new data centre. Should I try this? What do you think?

Hello, I’m looking for 2 separate dedicated servers in New York, USA. Each server should have: AMD EPYC CPU preferred Minimum 512 GB RAM CPU benchmark of 100,000+ 10 Gbps port 2 × 2 TB NVMe storage Budget: up to $400/month per server Please share your best available configuration and pricing.

Looking for a small low cost VPS in both these locations: Central US - Texas/Kansas/... Germany Minimum: 1 core 1 GB Ram 10 GB Disk 1 IPv4

I have 2 vps there , they had a Urgent Hypervisor Restart , but one of my vps its offline 3 days now , @Chunkserve it's not responding in the tickets also i wrote him here again no answer , is there anyone else having the same issue ?

We have several HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen9 servers available for sale. Specifications: Model: HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen9 CPU: 2 × Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 Network: HPE Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560FLR-SFP+ adapter Rails: Included Memory: Not included Storage: Not included Price: $150 USD per server Location: The servers are currently located at Hurricane Electric Fremont 2 (FMT2) in Fremont, California. Local pickup is strongly preferred. Pickup must be arranged in advance. Bonus: We also have one Cisco Catalyst 4948E switch available. It will be included free of charge with the first completed server purchase. The switch is limited to one unit and will go to the first buyer who completes payment and pickup, not simply the first person to comment. Please comment in the thread or send me a PM if interested.