CommPulse

VeloxServ is a privately owned UK colocation provider with over 18 years of proven operational experience. We offer secure, resilient data centre space just outside Birmingham, UK - delivering enterprise-grade infrastructure at significantly lower cost than London Docklands. 📍 Locations: Wolverhampton & Redditch 🏢 Facilities: 3 purpose-built, high-spec UK data centres ⚡ Immediate occupation available Why Choose VeloxServ? ISO 9001 & 27001 Accredited Fully redundant N+N UPS & N+N Diesel Generators (auto changeover) 100Gbps+ resilient network with multiple fibre wavelengths to London Docklands & Manchester N+1 CRAC cooling 24/7/365 on-site support & remote hands Secure access to all technical areas VESDA & FM200 fire suppression HD CCTV with 24/7 recording Free parking, Wi-Fi & refreshments for visiting engineers What’s Included with Every Rack Lockable cabinet Dual A+B power feeds APC PDUs 10Gbps network uplink 100TB monthly bandwidth (CDR billing available) /28 IPv4 subnet (13 usable IPs, more available with justification) Remote hands available 24/7/365 data centre access 18-month contract £0 setup fee UK Colocation Packages (Fully Customisable) Single Server Colocation 1U-4U 0.5A to 4A power options from £45 / month Lockable Quarter Rack 2A power (scalable up to 8A) £175 / month Lockable Half Rack 4A power (scalable up to 16A) £325 / month Lockable Full Rack 8A power (scalable up to 64A) £575 / month Lockable Full Rack 16A power (scalable up to 64A) £875 / month Need Something Bespoke? We specialise in custom colocation solutions, higher power densities delivered via 3phase racks, private networking, and tailored bandwidth. 👉 Contact us today to reserve space or design a custom solution.

Looking for a dedicated server with the following specs: Number of Cores: Min. 16 cores or Dual CPU RAM: Min. 64GB Disk Space: 1TB NVMe (OS) + 4TB NVMe (Data) Bandwidth: Min. 330TB/month included Port Speed: 10Gbps DDoS Protection: Not required Location: EU Budget: ~150€, Crypto (USDT/XMR etc.) preferred Billing period: Monthly Thank you very much!

Hello LET, We're offering Intel Xeon E5 V3/V4 dedicated servers hosted in our Tier IV-certified Mumbai data center. These servers are well-suited for web hosting, virtualization, enterprise applications, databases, development environments, and other business workloads. Deal #1 : Processor Type : Intel Xeon E5 V3/V4 Supported Processors : • 1 X Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 14 Core 2.8 Ghz • 1 X Intel Xeon E5-2667 V4 8 Cores 3.2 Ghz • 2 X Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 28 Core 2.8 Ghz • 2 X Intel Xeon E5-2667 V4 16 Cores 3.2 Ghz RAM : Starting from 32 GB to 384 GB Disk size : Starting from 480 GB SSD to 3.84 TB NVMe Pricing : Starting from 183$ Order Here 👉 for USD Order Here 👉 for INR Why Choose Leapswitch? Enterprise-grade Intel Xeon E5 V3/V4 dedicated servers DDR5 ECC memory for enhanced reliability and performance Enterprise U.3 NVMe SSD storage Flexible hardware customization (RAM, storage, bandwidth, and storage upgrades) Tier IV-certified data center infrastructure Same-day provisioning (subject to stock availability) 20+ years of trust. Already served 22000+ customers. Team of 120+ engineers with 24/7 customer support Custom Configuration Available Need more RAM, additional NVMe storage, higher bandwidth, or a custom server configuration? We can tailor a dedicated server to meet your infrastructure requirements. Contact Us Sales : [email protected] Phone : +91 9599656657 If you have any questions about these configurations or need a custom quote, feel free to reply to this thread or contact our sales team.

I need a VPS in Singapore with a 1c1g configuration, approximately 500GB of bandwidth out is also acceptable. Thank you. My budget is around $10-$17/year.

🇺🇸 🇫🇷 🇨🇦 KVM VPS from $48/year | SSD RAID10 | IPv4 + IPv6 | Since 2016 Hello LET, HostNamaste has been providing affordable and reliable VPS hosting since 2016. Today we're offering our yearly KVM VPS plans in the USA, France, and Canada with SSD RAID10 storage, full virtualization, IPv4 + IPv6 connectivity, and 24/7 support. Why Choose HostNamaste? ✔ Established Since 2016 ✔ KVM Virtualization ✔ Full Root Access ✔ SSD RAID10 Storage ✔ IPv4 + IPv6 Included ✔ SolusVM / Virtualizor - VPS Control Panel Access ✔ Instant Setup ✔ Custom ISO Support ✔ 24/7/365 Support ✔ Multiple Global Locations 🚀 YEARLY KVM VPS DEALS $48/year – 2GB KVM VPS ● 2 GB RAM ● 50 GB SSD RAID10 Storage ● 2 TB Premium Bandwidth ● 2 vCPU Cores ● 1 x IPv4 Address ● 1 x IPv6 Address ● KVM Virtualization ● VPS Control Panel Access ● USA, France & Canada ORDER NOW $60/year – 3GB KVM VPS ● 3 GB RAM ● 80 GB SSD RAID10 Storage ● 3 TB Premium Bandwidth ● 2 vCPU Cores ● 1 x IPv4 Address ● 1 x IPv6 Address ● KVM Virtualization ● VPS Control Panel Access ● USA, France & Canada ORDER NOW $72/year – 4GB KVM VPS ● 4 GB RAM ● 120 GB SSD RAID10 Storage ● 4 TB Premium Bandwidth ● 2 vCPU Cores ● 1 x IPv4 Address ● 1 x IPv6 Address ● KVM Virtualization ● VPS Control Panel Access ● USA, France & Canada ORDER NOW 🌎 Available Locations 🇺🇸 Los Angeles, California, USA 🇺🇸 Dallas, Texas, USA 🇫🇷 Paris, France 🇨🇦 Toronto, Canada 🖥 Infrastructure ● Dual Intel Xeon E5 Series ● 256 GB RAM ● SSD RAID10 Storage ● 1 Gbps Network Uplink 🐧 Operating Systems & Templates Choose from a wide range of operating systems and templates including: ● AlmaLinux ● Rocky Linux ● Ubuntu ● Debian ● Fedora ● CentOS ● Oracle Linux ● OpenSUSE ● Windows Server Templates ● Custom ISO Installation Support View the complete list: https://www.hostnamaste.com/blog/operating-systems-templates-we-support/ 💳 Payment Methods We support customers worldwide through multiple payment methods including: ● PayPal ● Credit Cards ● Debit Cards ● Cryptocurrency ● UPI ● Alipay ● Payoneer ● Net Banking ● Digital Wallets ● Regional Payment Methods Full payment methods list: https://www.hostnamaste.com/blog/payments-we-accept-hostnamaste/ 📡 Network Information Los Angeles: https://www.hostnamaste.com/datacenter-losangeles.php Dallas: https://www.hostnamaste.com/datacenter-dallas.php France: https://www.hostnamaste.com/datacenter-france.php Canada: https://www.hostnamaste.com/datacenter-canada.php 📜 Terms Terms of Service: https://www.hostnamaste.com/tos.php Acceptable Usage Policy: https://www.hostnamaste.com/aup.php If you have any questions, need a custom VPS configuration, or require additional resources, please feel free to reply below or submit a support ticket. Thank you for considering HostNamaste!

Hi, everyone. I was thinking about my VPS just now and thought I'd write a short review about it and my provider. I signed up for @Terabix in November 2024 and went for their CVM-2GB plan. I played with it for a month and was completely happy with it. The server was snappy; nothing bad to report at all. However, I cancelled it soon after because I got their 2024 BF offer (BF-1GB plan), which is more efficient for my usage (just a Caddy reverse proxy and some internal VPN stuff, with CrowdSec (GeoIP disabled) for protection). And it has performed admirably ever since. I am also just as happy with their customer support as I am with their server performance. They are courteous, friendly and helpful. Shout out to Justin! 🫡 For the record, I have only ever opened three support tickets: the first was to request one additional /64 IPv6 block, the second was to request a manual deletion of an IPv6 address in the control panel, and the last was to migrate said IP block from the old VM to the new VM. As a Malaysian, I am delighted to see a local company providing a great service at competitive value (great value in my case!), especially one that made me stop VPS hunting. I hope the company grows and thrives. Have a nice day, everyone. 😃 Obligatory YABS benchmark result: # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # Yet-Another-Bench-Script # # v2026-07-24 # # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script # # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # Thu Jul 30 12:27:58 +08 2026 Basic System Information: --------------------------------- Uptime : 2 days, 22 hours, 0 minutes Processor : AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor CPU cores : 1 @ 2396.400 MHz AES-NI : ✔ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled RAM : 927.1 MiB Swap : 1.9 GiB Disk : 9.8 GiB Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie) Kernel : 6.12.96+deb13-amd64 VM Type : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online IPv6 Network Information: --------------------------------- ISP : Terabix ASN : AS137552 Terabix Host : Terabix Technologies Sdn. Bhd Location : Johor Bahru, Johor (01) Country : Malaysia fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1): --------------------------------- Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 194.59 MB/s (47.5k) | 2.49 GB/s (38.0k) Write | 195.11 MB/s (47.6k) | 2.50 GB/s (38.2k) Total | 389.70 MB/s (95.1k) | 4.99 GB/s (76.2k) | | Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 5.28 GB/s (10.0k) | 5.80 GB/s (5.5k) Write | 5.56 GB/s (10.6k) | 6.19 GB/s (5.9k) Total | 10.84 GB/s (20.6k) | 11.99 GB/s (11.4k) iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 673 Mbits/sec | 394 Mbits/sec | 164 ms Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 969 Mbits/sec | 657 Mbits/sec | 161 ms Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 919 Mbits/sec | 296 Mbits/sec | 181 ms Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.10 Gbits/sec | 935 Mbits/sec | 1.93 ms Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 857 Mbits/sec | 420 Mbits/sec | 175 ms Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 752 Mbits/sec | 683 Mbits/sec | 227 ms Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | busy | 198 Mbits/sec | 330 ms iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 941 Mbits/sec | 487 Mbits/sec | 167 ms Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 966 Mbits/sec | 684 Mbits/sec | 156 ms Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | busy | 181 ms Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec | 928 Mbits/sec | -- Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 891 Mbits/sec | 466 Mbits/sec | 182 ms Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 735 Mbits/sec | 479 Mbits/sec | 226 ms Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | busy | 216 Mbits/sec | 342 ms Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test: --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | Multi Core | Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18865830 YABS completed in 25 min 51 sec My plan info page:

I got my hands on one of @HostDZire 's own (own HW) VPS in NL, AMS and of course benchmarked it. Here are the results (based on > 30 runs). As usual first sysinfo processor and memory. Version 2.5.0a, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com) Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC 7K62 48-Core Processor OS, version: FreeBSD 14.2, Mem.: 5.989 GB CPU - Cores: 4, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/49/0 Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 192M L3 Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 htt sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor Ext. Flags: syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy extapic cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw AES? Yes Nested Virt.? No HW RNG? Yes ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 229.4 - min 92.8 (40.5 %), max 366.0 (159.6 %) ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 990.3 - min 879.4 (88.8 %), max 1110.0 (112.1 %) ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 1065.2 - min 968.5 (90.9 %), max 1190.0 (111.7 %) ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 1151.5 - min 1144.2 (99.4 %), max 1157.4 (100.5 %) ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 101.1 - min 92.8 (91.8 %), max 107.8 (106.6 %) Nice and normal results for an Epyc. Crypto results also nice. All desirable flags are there. The only point of potential lack of happiness: no embedded virtualization, which I normally do not care about at all but with 4 vCores it might not be nonsensical to embed one or more smaller VPSs within a relatively beefy VPS. Now, let's look at the disk. --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 11.17 - min 8.50 (76.1%), max 12.69 (113.7%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 10.91 - min 8.56 (78.5%), max 13.26 (121.5%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 26.10 - min 18.67 (71.5%), max 34.72 (133.0%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 20.29 - min 14.51 (71.5%), max 30.75 (151.5%) --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 10.90 - min 9.25 (84.8%), max 13.38 (122.7%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 10.85 - min 9.50 (87.5%), max 13.41 (123.5%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 26.36 - min 18.86 (71.6%), max 34.47 (130.8%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 23.62 - min 17.10 (72.4%), max 29.68 (125.6%) --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 105.68 - min 89.90 (85.1%), max 123.18 (116.6%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 118.37 - min 99.80 (84.3%), max 139.77 (118.1%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2707.48 - min 2193.75 (81.0%), max 3538.00 (130.7%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 326.68 - min 216.00 (66.1%), max 424.00 (129.8%) --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 11.99 - min 9.72 (81.1%), max 13.14 (109.6%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 6.41 - min 5.41 (84.4%), max 6.88 (107.3%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2398.59 - min 1752.44 (73.1%), max 2857.05 (119.1%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 304.45 - min 230.67 (75.8%), max 380.80 (125.1%) --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 172.89 - min 149.98 (86.7%), max 189.32 (109.5%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 354.21 - min 300.21 (84.8%), max 397.65 (112.3%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 4418.78 - min 3775.67 (85.4%), max 5013.70 (113.5%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1622.05 - min 1390.84 (85.7%), max 1891.14 (116.6%) --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 41.49 - min 35.17 (84.8%), max 43.94 (105.9%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 26.81 - min 22.54 (84.1%), max 28.09 (104.8%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 3701.02 - min 3179.04 (85.9%), max 4109.73 (111.0%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1696.15 - min 1420.89 (83.8%), max 1987.98 (117.2%) --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 36.55 - min 34.62 (94.7%), max 37.90 (103.7%) IOps : avg 9357.70 - min 8861.50 (94.7%), max 9701.23 (103.7%) Wow, that's a quite nice NVMe with close to 10000 IOps! (Side note: while I do not know how many nodes with RAID'ed disk @HostDZire already have there, I know that this VPS has such a disk and there seem to be plans to upgrade all nodes) Finally connectivity, which I expect to be quite decent as the Leaseweb network is used. --- Europe --- NO OSL mirror.terrahost.no [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 479.3 - min 90.6 (18.9%), max 609.3 (127.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 20.0 - min 17.3 (86.5%), max 21.1 (105.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 61.3 - min 17.5 (28.5%), max 128.0 (208.7%) UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 1058.8 - min 166.5 (15.7%), max 1471.7 (139.0%) Ping [ms]: avg 8.8 - min 8.6 (97.2%), max 10.3 (116.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 8.9 - min 8.6 (96.6%), max 10.3 (115.7%) NL AMS nl.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 2455.6 - min 1500.9 (61.1%), max 3202.3 (130.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 1.0 - min 0.9 (90.9%), max 1.3 (131.4%) Web ping [ms]: avg 1.3 - min 0.9 (69.2%), max 2.1 (161.5%) DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 1190.4 - min 369.8 (31.1%), max 1395.9 (117.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 6.7 - min 6.6 (99.1%), max 7.3 (109.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 7.8 - min 6.8 (86.9%), max 22.7 (289.9%) FR PAR ftp1.fr.freebsd.org [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 554.5 - min 98.0 (17.7%), max 629.1 (113.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 11.7 - min 11.4 (97.8%), max 14.6 (125.3%) Web ping [ms]: avg 33.2 - min 11.4 (34.4%), max 123.2 (371.5%) CH ZUR mirror.init7.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 736.9 - min 147.3 (20.0%), max 852.4 (115.7%) Ping [ms]: avg 12.5 - min 12.4 (99.1%), max 12.7 (101.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 14.8 - min 12.6 (85.4%), max 17.7 (120.0%) ES MAD mirror.raiolanetworks.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 425.9 - min 365.0 (85.7%), max 447.7 (105.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 25.9 - min 24.7 (95.5%), max 30.7 (118.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 27.9 - min 24.9 (89.3%), max 35.1 (125.8%) RO BUC mirrors.hosterion.ro [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 298.0 - min 287.8 (96.6%), max 306.8 (103.0%) Ping [ms]: avg 34.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 36.5 (104.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 35.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 38.0 (108.1%) RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 253.3 - min 39.7 (15.7%), max 290.1 (114.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 40.6 - min 40.4 (99.6%), max 40.9 (100.8%) Web ping [ms]: avg 61.5 - min 42.9 (69.8%), max 303.1 (493.0%) --- Asia / Oceania --- RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 2] DL [Mb/s]: avg 117.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 132.7 (113.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 81.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 83.6 (102.8%) Web ping [ms]: avg 94.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 168.0 (177.9%) IN MUM mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 44.9 - min 29.4 (65.6%), max 48.0 (106.8%) Ping [ms]: avg 253.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 268.8 (105.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 257.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 283.3 (110.0%) SG SGP mirror.sg.gs [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 69.3 - min 61.2 (88.3%), max 71.5 (103.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 161.1 - min 159.1 (98.8%), max 163.5 (101.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 164.5 - min 160.1 (97.3%), max 168.0 (102.1%) CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 56.9 - min 43.6 (76.6%), max 62.0 (108.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 184.9 - min 184.7 (99.9%), max 185.0 (100.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 193.3 - min 184.8 (95.6%), max 297.9 (154.1%) CN BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 54.5 - min 35.1 (64.4%), max 66.5 (122.0%) Ping [ms]: avg 232.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 250.5 (108.0%) Web ping [ms]: avg 232.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 250.5 (107.9%) JP OSA mirrors.xtom.jp [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 43.9 - min 39.0 (88.7%), max 45.2 (103.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 250.8 - min 250.6 (99.9%), max 251.3 (100.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 251.2 - min 250.6 (99.8%), max 254.1 (101.2%) AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 1] DL [Mb/s]: avg 44.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.8 (105.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 251.9 - min 250.9 (99.6%), max 266.3 (105.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 252.0 - min 251.0 (99.6%), max 266.3 (105.7%) --- Africa --- KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 11] DL [Mb/s]: avg 27.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 61.4 (227.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 138.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 210.6 (151.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 158.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1015.3 (638.8%) ZA WEC archlinux.za.mirror.allworldit.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 63.1 - min 25.7 (40.7%), max 71.9 (113.9%) Ping [ms]: avg 156.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 185.2 (118.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 179.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 215.8 (120.1%) --- Americas --- CA MTL speedtest.mtl2.ca.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 125.3 - min 25.3 (20.2%), max 139.4 (111.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 82.2 - min 81.2 (98.8%), max 93.9 (114.3%) Web ping [ms]: avg 82.5 - min 81.4 (98.6%), max 93.9 (113.8%) US NYC nyc.mirrors.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 132.6 - min 42.8 (32.3%), max 141.5 (106.7%) Ping [ms]: avg 77.5 - min 77.0 (99.4%), max 81.5 (105.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 77.8 - min 77.2 (99.2%), max 81.7 (105.0%) US ASH ash.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 115.2 - min 105.9 (92.0%), max 128.4 (111.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 97.9 - min 97.7 (99.8%), max 98.7 (100.8%) Web ping [ms]: avg 98.0 - min 97.7 (99.7%), max 98.7 (100.7%) US PIB mirror.pit.teraswitch.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 113.5 - min 32.4 (28.6%), max 121.5 (107.1%) Ping [ms]: avg 92.3 - min 92.1 (99.8%), max 92.8 (100.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 93.8 - min 92.2 (98.3%), max 97.3 (103.7%) US MIA speedtest.mia11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 95.3 - min 33.1 (34.7%), max 108.9 (114.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 105.1 - min 104.8 (99.7%), max 106.3 (101.1%) Web ping [ms]: avg 105.6 - min 104.9 (99.3%), max 107.2 (101.5%) US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 121.4 - min 113.8 (93.7%), max 124.5 (102.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 93.5 - min 93.3 (99.8%), max 93.7 (100.2%) Web ping [ms]: avg 128.4 - min 93.6 (72.9%), max 176.8 (137.7%) US ATL atl.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 106.2 - min 36.0 (33.9%), max 119.3 (112.4%) Ping [ms]: avg 102.7 - min 101.0 (98.3%), max 104.3 (101.6%) Web ping [ms]: avg 103.5 - min 101.0 (97.6%), max 117.7 (113.8%) US PHO phx.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 77.3 - min 20.9 (27.1%), max 85.5 (110.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 130.2 - min 128.8 (98.9%), max 132.4 (101.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 131.5 - min 129.1 (98.2%), max 136.4 (103.7%) US PTL mirrors.cat.pdx.edu [F: 3] DL [Mb/s]: avg 66.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.3 (115.5%) Ping [ms]: avg 151.9 - min 148.7 (97.9%), max 153.2 (100.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 154.0 - min 149.0 (96.8%), max 160.8 (104.4%) US LAX speedtest.lax12.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 82.0 - min 26.3 (32.1%), max 87.0 (106.2%) Ping [ms]: avg 131.8 - min 130.8 (99.3%), max 134.0 (101.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 132.8 - min 131.2 (98.8%), max 138.8 (104.5%) US SJO mirrors.xtom.us [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 78.7 - min 63.5 (80.6%), max 82.4 (104.7%) Ping [ms]: avg 140.3 - min 140.2 (99.9%), max 140.8 (100.3%) Web ping [ms]: avg 140.5 - min 140.2 (99.8%), max 142.2 (101.2%) US SEA speedtest.sea11.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 71.9 - min 26.9 (37.4%), max 84.0 (116.8%) Ping [ms]: avg 139.8 - min 137.2 (98.2%), max 140.8 (100.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 139.9 - min 137.2 (98.1%), max 141.6 (101.2%) BR SPA mirror.ufscar.br [F: 2] DL [Mb/s]: avg 45.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 54.2 (120.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 210.1 - min 208.6 (99.3%), max 211.6 (100.7%) Web ping [ms]: avg 220.8 - min 209.8 (95.0%), max 252.6 (114.4%) BR CUR archlinux.c3sl.ufpr.br [F: 0] DL [Mb/s]: avg 46.7 - min 22.3 (47.7%), max 52.6 (112.6%) Ping [ms]: avg 211.8 - min 210.0 (99.1%), max 251.9 (118.9%) Web ping [ms]: avg 221.6 - min 210.2 (94.9%), max 264.3 (119.3%) CL SAN elmirror.cl [F: 3] DL [Mb/s]: avg 45.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 54.4 (120.3%) Ping [ms]: avg 217.2 - min 216.2 (99.5%), max 237.8 (109.5%) Web ping [ms]: avg 225.5 - min 216.2 (95.9%), max 267.1 (118.4%) Europe - Very nice indeed. And a few results above 1 Gb/s which confirms that the node has a 10 Gb/s pipe (or 5 Gb/s but I guess professional providers like Leaseweb don't play around but go directly from 1 Gb/s to 10 Gb/s. Asia / Oceania - Hmmm, IN, Mumbai quite weak, SGP and HongKong not really strong as well but some quite fast China targets. Japan and Straya also mediocre. Let me put it like this: if good Asia / Oceania connectivity is what you need I'd look elsewhere. Africa - half-cooked. One target quite decent, the other quite poor. Americas - When I see east-coast targets at about 125 Mb/s and Chicago at about 120 Mb/s (from Europe) I know I'm looking at a winner wrt cross-Atlantic connectivity. California at about 80 Mb/s is quite decent as well. What I also find really noteworthy are decent results on both south-american coasts. Summary/verdict: a really nice VPS with excellent connectivity within Europe and to North-America. Asia / Oceania is the only bitter pill wrt connectivity. Clearly recommended and even a cheapie for what you get (as long as you can live with mediocre Asia / Oceania connectivity and a bit of risk wrt your data, until the upgrade is complete for all nodes). But there's also the Leaseweb "original" version! And there were a few discussions recently about which version is more attractive, which triggered this examination and thread. To avoid misunderstandings: based on what I know both products (HD and LW VPS) use the same colo and network. HostDZire's product has/runs on its own hardware however - *that's it, that's the difference (modulo temporarily some non-RAID disks). Well, the first thing that triggered my interest is the price difference and AFAIK it's hefty ($47/yr for LW, $26/yr for HD IIRC). So obviously the question arises what morer or betterer do you get for almost double the $$ (from LW)? Let's have a good close look. And yes, of course I also benchmarked the Leaseweb version! Here's the results, based on > 30 runs. Version 2.5.0a, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com) Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC Processor OS, version: FreeBSD 14.4, Mem.: 5.989 GB CPU - Cores: 4, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/1/2 Cache: 32K/64K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 8M L3 Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 htt sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor Ext. Flags: syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw topoext AES? Yes Nested Virt.? No HW RNG? Yes ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 236.6 - min 93.1 (39.4 %), max 383.1 (161.9 %) ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 806.8 - min 574.6 (71.2 %), max 1070.0 (132.6 %) ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 953.4 - min 673.5 (70.6 %), max 1120.0 (117.5 %) ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 1133.7 - min 1059.3 (93.4 %), max 1179.2 (104.0 %) ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 101.9 - min 93.1 (91.4 %), max 109.0 (107.0 %) Very little difference at first glance. But there's an interesting detail: Single core performance on Leaseweb is (slightly) better while multi-core performance is better on the HostDZire version. Interesting. How come? Hint: Look at the L1 and L3 caches of both! LW has a larger L1i cache (64 KB vs 32 KB) which translates to faster single-core performance, while HD has a giant L3 cache, which leads to higher multi-threading performance. I personally prefer HostDZire's approach. Simple reason: A VPS node almost always has many VPSs and with quite different workloads and lots and lots of task switches. L2 can't help a whole lot if there are more than 8 VPS on a node (512KB div 64KB = 8 (graciously ignoring the 32KB L1d)) and that view still is almost idiotically in favour of LW because it assumes that each VPS does exactly the same task, i.e. internal task switches don't invalidate L1. A massive L3 cache though can and does buffer a significant parts of (very time expensive) DRAM accesses which significantly benefits VPS nodes (as the results show). processor & memory summary: HostDZire's processor choice is clearly (and demonstrably) better. Now, let's look at the disk. --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 8.25 - min 7.68 (93.0%), max 9.17 (111.1%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 8.12 - min 7.70 (94.9%), max 8.68 (106.9%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 23.84 - min 22.07 (92.6%), max 25.06 (105.1%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 21.20 - min 19.76 (93.2%), max 23.20 (109.4%) --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 8.23 - min 7.75 (94.1%), max 8.87 (107.7%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 8.09 - min 7.48 (92.5%), max 8.54 (105.6%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 23.74 - min 22.27 (93.8%), max 25.05 (105.5%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 21.13 - min 19.00 (89.9%), max 22.39 (105.9%) --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 76.18 - min 59.20 (77.7%), max 83.04 (109.0%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 83.59 - min 79.16 (94.7%), max 88.20 (105.5%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2846.76 - min 2627.32 (92.3%), max 3006.36 (105.6%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 294.03 - min 269.53 (91.7%), max 312.96 (106.4%) --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 7.75 - min 6.46 (83.4%), max 9.24 (119.3%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 4.16 - min 3.59 (86.2%), max 4.87 (117.0%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 2829.59 - min 2594.43 (91.7%), max 3082.77 (108.9%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 292.52 - min 271.14 (92.7%), max 310.11 (106.0%) --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 111.54 - min 76.28 (68.4%), max 119.04 (106.7%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 218.73 - min 201.14 (92.0%), max 237.75 (108.7%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 4374.31 - min 4199.96 (96.0%), max 4641.00 (106.1%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1342.01 - min 1087.97 (81.1%), max 1563.24 (116.5%) --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 27.23 - min 24.82 (91.2%), max 29.53 (108.5%) Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 17.60 - min 16.23 (92.2%), max 18.70 (106.2%) Read seq. [MB/s]: avg 4383.68 - min 4141.23 (94.5%), max 4547.53 (103.7%) Read rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1348.34 - min 1217.51 (90.3%), max 1622.98 (120.4%) --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) --- Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 27.52 - min 26.55 (96.5%), max 28.66 (104.2%) IOps : avg 7044.35 - min 6797.06 (96.5%), max 7337.33 (104.2%) HostDZire's disk clearly is significantly faster - but: Leaseweb's disk is roughly in the same ballpark and by no means crappy. Plus, albeit only temporary, Leaseweb's disk is RAID'ed while HostDZire hasn't completed their upgrade process yet (AFAIK). TL;DR / verdict I'll put it like this: as I'm not running critical business stuff on that VPS (in fact on most of my VPS) I'm not really disturbed by not all of HD's nodes having RAID yet (mine is RAID'ed though, lucky me *g). HostDZire's version IMO has a better processor & memory combo, a faster disk (again: modulo not yet RAID on all nodes), exactly the same connectivity as LW, and is in fact in the same colo as well. And is way cheaper ! Don't get me wrong, I'm a big Leaseweb fan and certainly not inclined to bash them in any way! But at the end of the day I get more performance for a much lower price with the HostDZire VPS version. So, I sincerely thank HostDZire for providing a LW VPS to me for benchmarking, but I'll give it back and keep my NL, AMS HostDZire VPS . It's better and cheaper, simple as that.

Man this is crazy, this is near to capabilities of the frontier models and recently on X see few of them pushing kimi k3 to 1bit and it has a capabilities to run locally with 78% accuracy. It seems on Breakthrough on the AI NPU will end the OpenAi and Claude 🤣😂😂😂

Hello Title, I have a svc that needs bare metal with high core count, min 8, 16 threads and either iGPU or an older GPU also works like RX 580 but 8GB VRam minimum My current setup ranges from 5700G hosts to i5 13500 to Ryzen 5950x with RX 580 I need 64GB Ram minimum and am willing to pay ~$50~$100 depending on the server Any recommendations? This is a infra heavy service the one I'm building so whoever becomes a partner I will for sure need more and more dedicated servers as the service grows. Best

Hello Everyone! We've been working hard on a new Anti Spam system for all CraneMail, Shared, & Reseller customers! Big focus on this project is to build an intuitive portal, as SpamExperts is... uniquely designed. As reported by ~almost everyone thats beta testing, Our 'out of the box' experience is as good, or better than, SpamExperts. To quote one beta tester: "I feel completely confident letting my clients use this. That hasn't been the case while they've been on SpamExperts." We'd love to invite everyone, even those that aren't a NameCrane customer, to take part in the beta. You can PM me your domain, the primary user/admin, and where to route it to, and you'll be off to the races. If you have multiple domains you can request I set up a reseller account for you as well. We aren't selling this as standalone filtering or as a SAAS product, but users that contribute useful feedback (UX, filtering performance, bugs, etc) will be allowed to keep their filtering, even if its pointing externally. Note: You'll need to whitelist our relays on your mailserver otherwise they may block us and cause issues. We're after brutally honest feedback! Features Here's a quick run of the features: Ability to add rules that match all parts of an email, with basic matches, or advanced regexp patterns. Ability to poke/tweak scoring on emails. Useful when you can't outright block a domain/sender, but want to nudge things. Create quarantine reports that include whatever you want, when you want, for whomever you want. Create domain digest report that is emailed on a schedule that includes all emails sent to any user. -- This is very useful for company/msp postmasters that need greater monitoring. Ability to restrict which languages you'll accept emails in. Ability to restrict emails by content/topic (politics, social media, finances, etc). Full quarantine system allowing for domain users to release/train/whitelist emails without logging in. Filter out attachments by extension (we include our own defaults, but you can quickly change that). While our own anti-spam BAYES is quite good, as you train emails as HAM/SPAM in the system, it'll train a personalized BAYES database for your domain, and in time (once you train 50 ham & 50 spam), the personalized BAYES will handle your scoring. This can help a lot with non english languages, or even just to train the system on what you perceive as ham/spam. A self-hosted LLM is also used for scoring spam, language detection, & content classifying. Topic filtering got a major upgrade this week greatly improving accuracy, especially in non english languages. We'd still count this as 'in beta' though as we're needing more samples from under represented languages. Reseller Branding & Management Reseller branding is another big feature SpamExperts lacks. Our portal allows resellers to assign their own MX hostnames to rebrand our mx?.mxfilter.net ones, change colours, and brand pages with their logo. SSO login emails, landing pages, quarantine reports, digests, get your brand colours, labels, & logo. A centralize dashboard lets you see all of your domains inbound/outbound, top senders & destinations, etc. Reseller Abilities Resellers can add filters (allow, deny, regexp, score tweaks, etc) which are then processed for every domain in their account. Resellers are also able to set 'domain defaults' for filtering, attachment blocks, & language restrictions. This is extremely useful for MSP's where each onboard involves loading up the same rulesets over and over. Now, just set it once at the reseller level, and all domains automatically benefit. You can check https://mxfilter.namecrane.org to see how the branding looks. There is multiple pre-set palettes (tailwindcss) available that should cover most companies. Let us know if you're wanting us to add others! Check them out here: https://files.namecrane.com/franexperts/K5AEFVD.png https://files.namecrane.com/franexperts/8YJBsoC.png https://files.namecrane.com/franexperts/ElNsGVr.png https://files.namecrane.com/franexperts/e8SFa8n.png Multiple regions We've added additional regions for filtering redundancy: Las Vegas Netherlands (technically NEW, will replace the existing UK node) New York - NEW Singapore - NEW Las Vegas, Netherlands & New York are IPV6 enabled for inbound mail with Singapore pending a BGP prefix update. Depending on demand we'll add another server in Europe (Germany, France, Poland, Romania, something EEA) for redundancy for those that want to operate 'Europe Only' emailing. Will this replace SpamExperts? In time, most likely. While SpamExperts does a decent job with filtering, its fairly fragile and quite frustrating to administer. We've had no less than 5 multi hour outages on the platform in the past 6 months. Something had to give since they've not been interested in fixing the issues. What does it look like? Here's some screenshots for you. Again, you can view a branded page here: https://mxfilter.namecrane.org Thanks! Francisco

This is about SporeStack , not Slow Servers . Slow Servers has always performed terribly in search engine results! SporeStack does okay on Brave search and is at the top of DuckDuckGo for "monero vps." However, it seems to be delisted on Google. I believe it used to be at the top for the same query, or very nearly. Admittedly, this might be my fault because of my robots.txt , attempting to block all sorts of AI-related bots. Now I specifically didn't block the usual "GoogleBot" or whatever it's called. But maybe this is impacting my SEO in another way? I'd appreciate any advice you can offer. Thank you!

Looking Ryzen 5/ 7 64 gb 500 gb 50/60$ monthly us location

https://eco.ovhcloud.com/en-ie/ 6700K for €4.99? I've already placed the order, I wonder what will happen.

Hello, As the title says. The criteria in there are non-negotiable (maaaaybe I might consider getting a 150GB NVMe). vCPUs must be dedicated. Aiming for but negotiable: 1Gbps / 5TB+ monthly, upgradability. Thanks in advance & regards.

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a dedicated server located in the USA with a budget of around $50/month. Requirements: USA location Dedicated server (not VPS) Intel or Ryzen 6-8 core 16-32GB RAM preferred SSD/NVMe storage 1/10 Gbps port Good network and reliable uptime Monthly billing

Hello, Looking for cheapest windows web hosting plan... With 1GB space or more is enough. Thank you all for advice.

Guys, post the best vps annual deals y'all have found so far under 15$/year! Also if you're already using one do mention the provider and experience with them so far, curious to see what deals y'all have found so far! For me right now I'm using Dedirock 7$ a year vps with 2gb ram, 1vcpu and 2tb bandwidth. For the price it's pretty great to host like small websites and docker services.

Requirements: Some Ryzen 5000+ would be very nice too for my application. 1c1g 1Gbps 1TB traffic minimum Budget 5eur/month Crypto payment (LTC/XMR). Looking for a relatively good network, no need for DDoS protection.

Hi everyone, I’m a Chinese programmer who likes buying servers and building services on them in my free time. I’ve been using and experimenting with various setups for a while. Recently I saw a dedicated server listed for transfer on another forum: CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6 (4C/8T) RAM: 32GB DDR4 Storage: 4 × 8TB HDD (32TB raw) – drives have relatively high power-on hours Network: 10Gbps unmetered IPs: /29 (5 usable IPv4) Location: Kansas City, USA Price: $50/month I’m considering taking it over and turning it into a small Seedbox service (shared slots). Before I commit, I want to gauge real interest first. Preliminary plan (open to adjustment): Split into roughly 6–8 slots (depending on final usable space after RAID) Target storage per slot: around 2–3TB Price idea: $12–15 / month per slot Includes basic apps (qBittorrent / ruTorrent, etc.) Payment via crypto preferred, other methods possible What I’m looking for: If I can get solid interest from at least 4–5 people who are willing to pay, I will: Take over the server Live-stream / document the full setup process (RAID, Seedbox panel, isolation, etc.) Build a simple payment + management page Start selling the slots I’m not looking to make big money — mainly want to cover the $50 cost and gain some practical experience running a small shared service. A few honest notes: Location is USA (Kansas City), so DMCA risk is higher than NL/FR. HDDs are not new, so I plan to run RAID6 for safety. This is a small personal project, not a big commercial operation. If you’re interested, please reply with: How much storage you roughly need Preferred price range Any features you care about (Plex, specific apps, etc.) Also very welcome any suggestions — better pricing, different slot sizes, RAID advice, panel recommendations, or anything else. I’m open to feedback. Thanks for reading. Looking forward to your thoughts.

We believe Vanilla Forums is the best Forum software with a bright future. Would you like to volunteer to assist? Simply post your interest here: https://hostboards.com/categories/Vanilla Ramesh Narayanan has been customizing Vanilla Forums for over 5 years and used to write blogs for ColoCrossing: Ramesh(at)exoboosters.tech Now Ramesh is launching VanillaScoop, a fork to continue work on Free Vanilla Forum. In 2024, HigherLogic.com stopped supporting the free version of Vanilla Forums. In 2025, Higher Logic removed the repository of the free version of Vanilla from GitHub. Fortunately a former Dev, Lincoln saved the repository & posted it for Download. Lincoln also patched Free Vanilla to be compatible with PHP 8+ here: https://github.com/prosembler/vanilla Let's start with Lincoln's Repository and take Vanilla Scoop into 2027